header

UU Youth and Young Adults, part one

Filed under: Con Spirito, Improvisando — Jess at 10:42 am on Monday, April 28, 2008

I’ll be serving as a delegate for my congregation at the Unitarian Universalist Association’s General Assembly this year, so I’m looking carefully at the Youth and Young Adult Empowerment Resolution that has just been placed on the agenda for a vote.

I plan on writing a number of posts on this topic, so this one will serve as background.

First, on the resolution: it came about, to my understanding, due to actions of the UUA Board of Trustees cutting funding for national support of the Young Religious UUs program, preferring to focus resources directly on congregations rather than nationally. The Board was not very transparent about this process, apparently, and the YRUU steering committee, with support from the District committees and individual youth and young adults have created a resolution to call on the UUA to affirm its support of youth and young adult “empowerment.”

Second, on my perspective: I came into Unitarian Universalism not quite nine years ago as a young adult parent. I have to confess that since the beginning of my time in this faith I have been puzzled by the fervor with which many youth and young adult members hold up “Cons” as the end-all be-all of youth and young adult involvement in Unitarian Universalism. As a young parent with no extra money and no access to affordable child care in order to travel to a Con, my involvement has always been only directly with my congregation.

As a young parent, also, I never felt welcome at any of the young adult events even locally, since they seemed focused around hooking up rather than spiritual pursuits. In short, I wanted religion, “grown-up” religion, and those programs geared toward young adults that I had access to never seemed to offer that.

The various online forums that have been available over the years have also seemed to be focused around Cons, hooking up, and anti-racism/anti-oppression work, the language of which seems indecipherable unless one has attended some kind of training, which is only available at a Con or GA. The first time I logged in to FUUSE, for example, I read a long forum conversation about the ethics of having sex at Cons, most of those participating being in favor of it. Color me confused.

In short, I have always felt like an outsider when it comes to the young adult “movement” within the Unitarian Universalist movement, even though I am still squarely within the target demographic.

As a parent, and as the wife of a seminarian-now-minister, I have seen youth programs in several congregations act as an isolation of this particular demographic, rather than serving youth as valuable members of the greater, intergenerational, whole of the congregation. In my observation, youth involvement in these congregations has been all about getting to District and Continental Cons, and not about their individual involvement in the congregation itself.

And then there is the question of youth and young adult worship. I attended the youth-led worship service during the 2005 GA, and was left wondering just what our movement was teaching our youth about worship — because it was more like a getting-to-know-you workshop than a time of worship, or worth-shaping. I’ve also been to a number of “Soulful Sundowns” and “Circle Worship” services, and on every occasion left with the same feeling. There’s been good music, perhaps a good reading or two, but then also some kind of disjointed group activity that seemed to have nothing to do with the material surrounding it. I have found those experiences to be painfully empty.

Having attended GA for several years, I’ve gone through a progression of feelings about the national youth and young adult movements. At my first GA in 2005, I was very impressed when the Youth Caucus swarmed the microphone during Plenary in opposition to a resolution they felt did not reflect anti-racist/anti-oppressive progress within UUism.

However, during that same GA, there was an altercation at one of the youth events, where volunteer doorkeepers charged with checking convention badges were accused of being racist as to who they would let in or not without a badge, among many other reported incidents that led the UUA Board of Trustees to form a special commission to investigate. And while I don’t doubt that our movement as a whole and individuals within have much work to do on eradicating racism and oppression, this particular kerfuffle seemed, to me, to be overly extreme and histrionic. And this, quite honestly, soured my opinion of youth “empowerment.”

At the last two GAs, I’ve made somewhat of an effort to get involved with the Young Adult Caucus, but when I’ve gone to a Plenary session with the intention of sitting in the Caucus-designated seating, it’s been empty. No young adults in sight.

So I’m left with a sense of the disconnect of the youth and young adult movements within our Unitarian Universalist movement. It certainly seems to me that something just isn’t working.

Next up: the resolution itself.

16 Singers in the Choir »

Comment by kisi

April 28, 2008 @ 11:14 am

I’m with you on this - I’ve had all sorts of conflicting opinions about this YRUU and Young Adult Network question. Our young adult group at our church is quite strong (200ish on the email list) but we pretty much do absolutely nothing with the national stuff. Likewise, we have a very strong youth group program, but they do a little more on the national level and love those “con”s.

I think there is some need for a national organization, because I see the value in having cross-congregational events with youth and young adults, because many congregations don’t have strong programs and they need a place to go. How it’s been done though, especially on the young adult level, hasn’t been working really well.

I’m not sure about putting young adult and youth under the same office. I think young adult programming would be secondary, and I think there’s a distinct difference between the type of programming young adults and youth want and need. I think we just need to redo young adult ministry, and get people like us on board :)

Comment by h sofia

April 28, 2008 @ 1:07 pm

I think ultimately, what most congregations desire is young adults who are very similar to the 50 year olds who run the churches. It’s certainly easier that way. For whatever reason, older people really like me, and I get along great with them. Being homeschooled, I place less importance on being with my “peers” than some others, and comfortably have friends who are much older than myself. I wonder if you don’t experience something similar, on some level.

I’ve outgrown cons for sure in the last 2 years, and was always more conservative in my lifestyle (tho not my beliefs) as was the trend in those environments. Still, I feel I really learned how to be a UU and feel passionate about it in con environments. I seriously doubt I’d have been a UU if I hadn’t gotten so involved with the YA community. Going to church on sundays would not have sustained me.

I know one of the people behind the resolution pretty well, and if people like her become involved in the future of YA UUA stuff, I would have great hope. Bringing those two worlds together - congregations and cons - is the key - and she has enough experience in both to understand that and make it happen.

Right now I see too much of a divide.

Comment by h sofia

April 28, 2008 @ 1:08 pm

Correction: “I seriously doubt I’d have been a UU if I hadn’t gotten so involved with the YA” should read, “I seriously doubt I’d still be a UU ….”

Comment by Jess

April 28, 2008 @ 1:27 pm

Hafidha said, “Going to church on sundays would not have sustained me.”

Is that because of the nature of going to church in general, or the lack of YA programs in your particular congregation?

I guess what I’m driving at is that many youth and young adult programs are completely divorced from their local congregations — or at best, loosely affiliated. As a result, the individual youth and young adult members are not integrated members of their congregations, either. This is what I would like to see change. And I guess I’m not convinced that will change by top-down programs from the UUA, regardless of the intentions behind the leadership, but only by supporting congregations more directly, to build a bottom-up movement.

More on this later, though. ;-)

Comment by h sofia

April 28, 2008 @ 2:21 pm

The church I went to had a very active YA group - that is how I came into the congregation (when I first became a UU, I worked on Sundays, but changed my work schedule after about six months to attend church on Sundays). The church had a staff person (a DRE) whose job was to attend to youth and young adult programming, but in reality she only worked on youth programming (which I’m sure was more than plenty for one person). The YA programming at my church was actually a Portland area young adult group. My church is the largest in this region, so many of the UUs were based out of there, but several of the most active members (such as Joseph Santos-Lyons) were not members of my church.

The problem of course, was that the YA group had little institutional support (we were allowed to use church space, and that’s it). The group died several years ago after those of us in leadership (including myself) became preoccupied with other life issues, got married, moved away, went off to grad school, etc. The church took a big step last year in hiring a person to specifically run young adult programs. There are now about 60 active young adults in the group. I hosted a potluck in December, and 27 people showed up at my house.

How many congregations can say they have a staff person with 20+ hours a week dedicated to facilitating a YA group? I would love for that percentage to be somewhere around 100%. =)

Comment by Jess

April 28, 2008 @ 2:50 pm

Given the smallish average size of our congregations, I would venture to guess that the percentage with dedicated staff for YA or youth programs is not that high — which is an argument in itself for resources to be allocated directly to congregations rather than focused nationally, I think.

Comment by Steven R

April 28, 2008 @ 3:48 pm

Jess - thanks for this post, this sums up many of my own feelings about the National UU youth movements. I am looking forward to where you will go with this - I almost hope that you will be able to take this series and do an about face and show how wrong these impressions are, and how good the programs actually are.

Comment by h sofia

April 28, 2008 @ 3:56 pm

I don’t see it as an either/or situation. The fact of the matter is that many young adults are simply not affiliated with any congregation at all. They belong to a district, but when the congregations pressure the district to only serve or look at congregation members, where do these people go?

I’m not saying that the congregations owe such young adults anything. Strictly speaking, they don’t.

But when I speak to congregational leaders, they sound awfully puzzled about “young people not checking us out.” I feel the same way about that as I do about all the other people who are not checking them out: why should they?

UUs really need to decide if they want to be a collection of churches, or if they want to be a religion that has churches. The William Doherty article I just read at UUWorld.org makes a good point that relates to this subject:

“Our children will not advance much beyond our adults, and if parents have allegiance only to a local congregation (and, even more limiting, to a particular favored minister) but not to the larger Unitarian Universalist movement, then why would we expect their children to join another UU church after they leave home and move away from their local community?”

I just don’t think congregations can have it both ways. To use a crude capitalist analogy, it’s like seeing a franchise that doesn’t want to contribute to the cost of branding on a national or global level, insisting that people walk through the doors solely based on the work they’re doing. All WHILE lamenting that its customer base is aging out.

Comment by Jess

April 28, 2008 @ 6:55 pm

I think congregations should support the district and national efforts, but I don’t think that support can be all that effective if it isn’t based in strong local congregations.

And as far as youth and YA involvement in a local church — it doesn’t have to be just about Sunday mornings if good programs are in place. But since the congregations don’t all have resources to offer those programs, people turn to the district or the national movement without that grounding — and this I think is more detrimental to the movement to foster life-long UUs as that emphasis takes resources away from local congregations where they might someday take their own children for religious education and community. Local programs always have the potential to serve more people than do regional or national programs. Again, it’s top-down vs. bottom up, to my mind.

Comment by h sofia

April 28, 2008 @ 7:58 pm

I agree that strong local programming is very important. Unfortunately, I don’t have much faith that whatever national or district contributions are being made by local congregations will be re-directed to the youth and young adults within the congregations themselves.

Maybe some people familiar with the budgets of their congregations could speak to that.

Comment by Patrick McLaughlin

April 28, 2008 @ 11:15 pm

Hafidha wrote:
I don’t have much faith that whatever national or district contributions are being made by local congregations will be re-directed to the youth and young adults within the congregations themselves.

Um. Ok. I’m pretty familiar with our small mid-szed congregation and its budget.

We’ve had fairly light YA attendance–but that’s seemed to be improving… probably in line with the overall de-graying of what was a completely childless congregation 11-12 years ago. Getting families with kids was a first, significant step. We’re making incremental improvement.

Unless the UUA is returning dues money to the congregations, which I’ve heard not the slightest hint of a rumor of a dream of, there’s nothing to redirect. We’ve stretched hard to get our minister, office manager, music staff and DRE all to fair compensation. Finding more to fund youth and young adult focused activity right now would be hard. We’ve already been making some fairly deep cuts.

If the UUA were to return funding to the districts or congregations earmarked as funds for young adult programming/staff support, that would be a very different thing.

That’s a report. I’m not saying it’s optimal. It is, however, reality for congregations that are towards the smaller size and lack endowments….

I don’t think that congregations are hostile to “movement” (I don’t think the UUA is, either). But I’ll admit that everything I’ve read suggests that the continental cons were largely the domain of a very small minority who were the beneficiaries of funding that I’d have to agree ought to be serving more people. I’m not saying that it didn’t serve or benefit those who could and did go. I’m simply saying that it feels like it was a very limited/privileged opportunity that benefited a fraction of a person per congregation.

Comment by Philocrites

April 29, 2008 @ 7:48 am

When I was a congregational young adult group leader in the early ’90s (November 1993?), the UUA sponsored a very helpful leadership training conference in California for young adults. It was congregationally-focused and brought together young adults, ministers, and DREs from all over the country. Four young adults from my Salt Lake young adult group (which included people from both congregations in that city) came to the conference, with funding assistance from the UUA. I learned a lot of useful things that helped our group thrive.

That sort of denominationally-supported program can help congregations improve their support of younger members, especially given the reality that a paid staff position isn’t possible or even necessarily desirable for most congregations. The conference wasn’t about “con culture,” it wasn’t about denominational politics or political ideologies, but it did have the side effect of connecting young adult leaders to each other.

Comment by Chalicechick

April 29, 2008 @ 8:06 am

Yeah, in my district, we have different kinds of Cons. Some are purely social, some are “teaching cons” that focus on developing skills that can be taken back to the individual congregations.

We have a rule in my church that youth group will pay for anyone attending a teaching con and those have paid off for us in the past. There was one on worship two years ago that I’m still wishing I’d attended.

Social-Justice-themed cons are, predictably, not my favorite thing, but it’s striking to watch youth go off to them and come back so energized and focused on making a better world.

The Cons that are purely social probably aren’t as valuable, but still, not every kid gets along with the youth group in their specific church. Sometimes those kids make good friends at the Cons, and those friendships can keep them connected to Unitarian Universalism.

CC

Comment by Jess

April 29, 2008 @ 5:17 pm

Philo and CC, those are both great examples of how cons could be used to benefit congregations, that then go on to benefit the larger organizations even further. But my experience with youth cons is that the youth have wonderful experiences there, come home completely exhausted, and then don’t give anything back to the congregation.

There has to be a happy medium, wish I wish this empowerment resolution were actually asking for.

Comment by Chalicechick

May 1, 2008 @ 3:26 pm

(((But my experience with youth cons is that the youth have wonderful experiences there, come home completely exhausted, and then don’t give anything back to the congregation.)))

So the youth don’t give anything back to the congregation at all? Or you don’t see any benefits of con attendence reflected back in what they do give?

Comment by Jess

May 1, 2008 @ 3:39 pm

Generally speaking, the former — their church involvement is completely wrapped up in going to cons, and you don’t see them at any church events except YRUU. There are a few exceptions that are more involved, usually one or two in a congregation that I’ve directly observed.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Make an Entrance

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>